<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 357 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd., holding that the denial of credit for invoices issued in the name of the other merged unit was incorrect post-merger. The objection raised during the audit lost merit, as there was no time limit for availing Cenvat credit, and the inputs were received by one of the units that later merged. The impugned order disallowing the credit was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:40:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 357 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd., holding that the denial of credit for invoices issued in the name of the other merged unit was incorrect post-merger. The objection raised during the audit lost merit, as there was no time limit for availing Cenvat credit, and the inputs were received by one of the units that later merged. The impugned order disallowing the credit was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>