<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 353 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337273</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was not applicable to the respondent as they exclusively manufactured dutiable goods cleared to SEZ developers without duty payment. Since the goods were dutiable and not exempted, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the need for separate accounts for dutiable and exempted goods. The decision underscored the importance of the nature of goods cleared to SEZ developers and relied on judicial precedents in support of the respondent&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:39:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 353 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337273</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was not applicable to the respondent as they exclusively manufactured dutiable goods cleared to SEZ developers without duty payment. Since the goods were dutiable and not exempted, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the need for separate accounts for dutiable and exempted goods. The decision underscored the importance of the nature of goods cleared to SEZ developers and relied on judicial precedents in support of the respondent&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>