https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337269 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authority, confirming the liability of the main appellant for the payment of the differential Central Excise duty, penalties, and failure to adhere to proper valuation procedures for goods sold through a depot. The appellant's arguments regarding negligence and contestation of penalty imposition were deemed insufficient, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. en-us Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337269 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authority, confirming the liability of the main appellant for the payment of the differential Central Excise duty, penalties, and failure to adhere to proper valuation procedures for goods sold through a depot. The appellant's arguments regarding negligence and contestation of penalty imposition were deemed insufficient, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337269