<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 345 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337265</link>
    <description>A domestic producer may be excluded from the domestic industry under Rule 2(b) where it has a material relationship with a foreign producer of the subject goods and substantial exports from that related entity are shown. Cumulative assessment of dumped imports from multiple countries is permissible where dumping margins, import volumes and direct competition justify a single injury examination. Non-disclosure of confidential material supplied by a supporting domestic producer does not vitiate proceedings if that material was not relied on in the injury analysis and no prejudice is shown. Injury findings based on adverse effects on profit, cash flow and return on investment were sustained despite one producer&#039;s financial distress, and the anti-dumping duty notification and final findings were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 345 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337265</link>
      <description>A domestic producer may be excluded from the domestic industry under Rule 2(b) where it has a material relationship with a foreign producer of the subject goods and substantial exports from that related entity are shown. Cumulative assessment of dumped imports from multiple countries is permissible where dumping margins, import volumes and direct competition justify a single injury examination. Non-disclosure of confidential material supplied by a supporting domestic producer does not vitiate proceedings if that material was not relied on in the injury analysis and no prejudice is shown. Injury findings based on adverse effects on profit, cash flow and return on investment were sustained despite one producer&#039;s financial distress, and the anti-dumping duty notification and final findings were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>