<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 921 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189338</link>
    <description>Penalty for carrying admitted unaccounted stock was sustained because the assessee failed to produce books of account, bills, vouchers or builty despite ample opportunity, and a later affidavit was treated as a self-serving statement with little evidentiary value. The court also rejected the plea of violation of rule 50, holding that the record supported stock verification in the presence of witnesses and acceptance of valuation at the spot. On these facts, the Tax Board&#039;s deletion of penalty was unsustainable and the penalty order was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 921 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189338</link>
      <description>Penalty for carrying admitted unaccounted stock was sustained because the assessee failed to produce books of account, bills, vouchers or builty despite ample opportunity, and a later affidavit was treated as a self-serving statement with little evidentiary value. The court also rejected the plea of violation of rule 50, holding that the record supported stock verification in the presence of witnesses and acceptance of valuation at the spot. On these facts, the Tax Board&#039;s deletion of penalty was unsustainable and the penalty order was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>