<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ROYALTY PAYMENT TO GOVERNMENT - UN-DESIRABLE LITIGATION EVEN BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT – IN FACT AO SHOULD NOT HAVE DISALLOWED</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7184</link>
    <description>Royalty paid to State Governments calculated on the international (pre discount) well head price, when made pursuant to Central Government resolutions, notifications and communications preserving State revenue, qualifies as an allowable business expenditure and is not rendered illegal or disallowable under the Explanation to section 37. Concurrent factual findings by the CIT(A) and ITAT that the payments followed Government policy were upheld by the High Court and the Supreme Court, which dismissed revenue appeals for lack of valid legal grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:24:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:24:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ROYALTY PAYMENT TO GOVERNMENT - UN-DESIRABLE LITIGATION EVEN BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT – IN FACT AO SHOULD NOT HAVE DISALLOWED</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7184</link>
      <description>Royalty paid to State Governments calculated on the international (pre discount) well head price, when made pursuant to Central Government resolutions, notifications and communications preserving State revenue, qualifies as an allowable business expenditure and is not rendered illegal or disallowable under the Explanation to section 37. Concurrent factual findings by the CIT(A) and ITAT that the payments followed Government policy were upheld by the High Court and the Supreme Court, which dismissed revenue appeals for lack of valid legal grounds.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:24:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>