<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 798 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189325</link>
    <description>A reasoned Tribunal remand for fresh consideration did not, by itself, give rise to a substantial question of law. The Tribunal had sent back two additions to the Assessing Officer with stated reasons, and the HC found no perversity in that approach. On that basis, the Court held that no substantial question of law arose from the remand order, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s direction, and declined to entertain the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 17:50:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 798 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189325</link>
      <description>A reasoned Tribunal remand for fresh consideration did not, by itself, give rise to a substantial question of law. The Tribunal had sent back two additions to the Assessing Officer with stated reasons, and the HC found no perversity in that approach. On that basis, the Court held that no substantial question of law arose from the remand order, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s direction, and declined to entertain the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>