https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189320 The Supreme Court held that the Electricity Board could not be faulted for contesting the State Government's attempt to secure an employee's absorption, because the scope of the Government's policy-direction power under Section 78-A of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 was at least debatable. On that footing, the Board's legal stand did not justify judicial condemnation. The Court also reiterated that harsh strictures against parties or institutions should be made only in exceptional circumstances, and none existed here. The High Court's harsh observations against the Board were set aside. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jan 2017 17:01:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189320 The Supreme Court held that the Electricity Board could not be faulted for contesting the State Government's attempt to secure an employee's absorption, because the scope of the Government's policy-direction power under Section 78-A of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 was at least debatable. On that footing, the Board's legal stand did not justify judicial condemnation. The Court also reiterated that harsh strictures against parties or institutions should be made only in exceptional circumstances, and none existed here. The High Court's harsh observations against the Board were set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189320