<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1710 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189316</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision against the assessee on the retention money issue due to prior adverse rulings. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the deduction of proportionate leasehold premium, citing a favorable decision by the Hon. Gujarat High Court and the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s Special Leave Petition by the Hon. Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:56:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1710 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189316</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision against the assessee on the retention money issue due to prior adverse rulings. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the deduction of proportionate leasehold premium, citing a favorable decision by the Hon. Gujarat High Court and the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s Special Leave Petition by the Hon. Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>