<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (9) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6343</link>
    <description>Dividend traced to a company&#039;s accumulated capital gains was not taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands, as the question referred under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was treated as covered by the binding decision in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Nalin Behari Lall Singha. On that footing, the inclusion of Rs. 2,344 as dividend in the assessee&#039;s total income for assessment year 1949-50 was held unjustified, and the answer went against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (9) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6343</link>
      <description>Dividend traced to a company&#039;s accumulated capital gains was not taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands, as the question referred under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was treated as covered by the binding decision in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Nalin Behari Lall Singha. On that footing, the inclusion of Rs. 2,344 as dividend in the assessee&#039;s total income for assessment year 1949-50 was held unjustified, and the answer went against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>