<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6341</link>
    <description>Compensation received on termination of employment following nationalisation of the employer&#039;s undertaking was treated as a capital receipt rather than revenue income. The Supreme Court applied earlier decisions holding that such compensation is capital in character because it is paid for loss of the employment source itself, and accordingly it was not taxable as income. The amount was therefore held to be a capital receipt in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6341</link>
      <description>Compensation received on termination of employment following nationalisation of the employer&#039;s undertaking was treated as a capital receipt rather than revenue income. The Supreme Court applied earlier decisions holding that such compensation is capital in character because it is paid for loss of the employment source itself, and accordingly it was not taxable as income. The amount was therefore held to be a capital receipt in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>