<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 319 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337239</link>
    <description>Separate books maintained for company law compliance and income-tax computation were permissible, and a provision shown in corporate accounts did not defeat a bad debt claim under section 36(1)(vii) where the tax computation reflected a genuine write-off. The court also found that debiting the profit and loss account and crediting the individual debtor accounts amounted to an actual write-off, satisfying the statutory requirement. On that basis, the document states that a mere provision for doubtful debts is insufficient, but an actual write-off supports deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 09:13:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 319 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337239</link>
      <description>Separate books maintained for company law compliance and income-tax computation were permissible, and a provision shown in corporate accounts did not defeat a bad debt claim under section 36(1)(vii) where the tax computation reflected a genuine write-off. The court also found that debiting the profit and loss account and crediting the individual debtor accounts amounted to an actual write-off, satisfying the statutory requirement. On that basis, the document states that a mere provision for doubtful debts is insufficient, but an actual write-off supports deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>