<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 318 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337238</link>
    <description>Section 14A disallowance under Rule 8D applies only to expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income actually earned in the relevant previous year. Where no exempt income arises in that year, the assessment must remain year-specific and based on real income, so disallowance on a notional or anticipated exempt income cannot be sustained. The matching concept also requires the expenditure to be considered in the year in which the corresponding exempt income is actually received.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 318 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337238</link>
      <description>Section 14A disallowance under Rule 8D applies only to expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income actually earned in the relevant previous year. Where no exempt income arises in that year, the assessment must remain year-specific and based on real income, so disallowance on a notional or anticipated exempt income cannot be sustained. The matching concept also requires the expenditure to be considered in the year in which the corresponding exempt income is actually received.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>