<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 34 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6335</link>
    <description>The dispute concerned whether loss on sale of shares was a capital loss from realisation of investment or a trading loss from share-dealing business. The Tribunal treated the shares as investment holdings, relying on contemporaneous board resolutions, sale vouchers describing the transactions as sales of investments, and earlier balance-sheets showing the shares as investments. A later resolution passed after losses had already arisen was viewed as an attempt to recast the character of the loss. The SC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding, holding that it rested on material on record and that the evidence could not be reappraised merely because another view was possible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 34 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6335</link>
      <description>The dispute concerned whether loss on sale of shares was a capital loss from realisation of investment or a trading loss from share-dealing business. The Tribunal treated the shares as investment holdings, relying on contemporaneous board resolutions, sale vouchers describing the transactions as sales of investments, and earlier balance-sheets showing the shares as investments. A later resolution passed after losses had already arisen was viewed as an attempt to recast the character of the loss. The SC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding, holding that it rested on material on record and that the evidence could not be reappraised merely because another view was possible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>