<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 299 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337219</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that waste products like iron ore fines and coal fines cleared without duty payment by the appellant did not necessitate a 10% reversal of their value under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Citing precedents, the tribunal emphasized that such waste goods were not exempted final products, aligning with previous decisions that waste products cleared without duty payment did not require the 10% reversal. The judgment underscored the consistency in this interpretation and found no grounds to interfere with the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 299 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337219</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that waste products like iron ore fines and coal fines cleared without duty payment by the appellant did not necessitate a 10% reversal of their value under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Citing precedents, the tribunal emphasized that such waste goods were not exempted final products, aligning with previous decisions that waste products cleared without duty payment did not require the 10% reversal. The judgment underscored the consistency in this interpretation and found no grounds to interfere with the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>