<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 295 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337215</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on capital goods could not be denied by invoking the extended period merely because the supplier&#039;s classification was altered later, where the duty-paying documents then on record showed a heading eligible for credit and there was no evidence that the buyer knew of the supplier&#039;s classification dispute. On that basis, the demand lacked legal support on limitation, the denial of credit was set aside, and the order-in-appeal was quashed, restoring the adjudicating authority&#039;s order dropping the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 295 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337215</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on capital goods could not be denied by invoking the extended period merely because the supplier&#039;s classification was altered later, where the duty-paying documents then on record showed a heading eligible for credit and there was no evidence that the buyer knew of the supplier&#039;s classification dispute. On that basis, the demand lacked legal support on limitation, the denial of credit was set aside, and the order-in-appeal was quashed, restoring the adjudicating authority&#039;s order dropping the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>