<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 292 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the inclusion of extra consideration received on transit insurance in the assessable value for excise duty calculation, as the inflated charges indicated evasion of duty. Emphasizing that excise duty is on the manufacturer, not transportation profits, the Tribunal upheld the decision based on consistent interpretation of the law and relevant precedents. The appeal was dismissed, highlighting the requirement for the price at the time of removal to be the sole consideration for sale to ensure compliance with excise duty valuation rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 292 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the inclusion of extra consideration received on transit insurance in the assessable value for excise duty calculation, as the inflated charges indicated evasion of duty. Emphasizing that excise duty is on the manufacturer, not transportation profits, the Tribunal upheld the decision based on consistent interpretation of the law and relevant precedents. The appeal was dismissed, highlighting the requirement for the price at the time of removal to be the sole consideration for sale to ensure compliance with excise duty valuation rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>