<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (7) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6333</link>
    <description>An assessment on a deceased taxpayer&#039;s legal representative was treated as unsustainable where the Mysore Income-tax Act, 1923 contained no provision comparable to section 24B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 authorising such a levy. The department did not dispute that absence of an express charging mechanism made the assessments invalid, and the later insertion of section 24B in the 1922 Act supported that interpretation. A separate attempt to sustain the demand by treating the taxpayer as a Hindu undivided family also failed because the revenue had proceeded throughout on the basis of individual assessment and could not shift its stand at a later stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (7) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6333</link>
      <description>An assessment on a deceased taxpayer&#039;s legal representative was treated as unsustainable where the Mysore Income-tax Act, 1923 contained no provision comparable to section 24B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 authorising such a levy. The department did not dispute that absence of an express charging mechanism made the assessments invalid, and the later insertion of section 24B in the 1922 Act supported that interpretation. A separate attempt to sustain the demand by treating the taxpayer as a Hindu undivided family also failed because the revenue had proceeded throughout on the basis of individual assessment and could not shift its stand at a later stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>