<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 277 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337197</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value of imported goods could not be rejected merely because the foreign collaborator held 50% equity in the importer. Enhancement of customs value requires proof of a related-person relationship based on mutuality of interest and reciprocal commercial control; mere shareholding, nominee participation, or collaborative involvement is insufficient without independent evidence that each party has a corresponding business interest in the other. In the absence of such proof, the declared value remains acceptable and cannot be enhanced on that ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 09:10:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 277 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337197</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value of imported goods could not be rejected merely because the foreign collaborator held 50% equity in the importer. Enhancement of customs value requires proof of a related-person relationship based on mutuality of interest and reciprocal commercial control; mere shareholding, nominee participation, or collaborative involvement is insufficient without independent evidence that each party has a corresponding business interest in the other. In the absence of such proof, the declared value remains acceptable and cannot be enhanced on that ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>