<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 268 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337188</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed a writ petition challenging a contract award by the Income Tax Department, finding no statutory violations or malafides. The Court upheld the contract&#039;s validity, specifically Clause 7.5 on minimum wages compliance, as the Department followed Central Govt. rates. It ruled the contract for technical and non-technical labor couldn&#039;t be split based on bid rates. The Court concluded that the award decision was justified, based on subjective satisfaction and regulatory compliance, and dismissed the petition for lacking legal merit and specific allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 268 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337188</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed a writ petition challenging a contract award by the Income Tax Department, finding no statutory violations or malafides. The Court upheld the contract&#039;s validity, specifically Clause 7.5 on minimum wages compliance, as the Department followed Central Govt. rates. It ruled the contract for technical and non-technical labor couldn&#039;t be split based on bid rates. The Court concluded that the award decision was justified, based on subjective satisfaction and regulatory compliance, and dismissed the petition for lacking legal merit and specific allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>