<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 267 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337187</link>
    <description>A licensee who filed a timely renewal application for a Form 2B excise licence could not claim the reduced-fee benefit under Rule 10(3)(b)(ii) because renewal was delayed by his own failure to produce the mandatory trade licence. Rule 6(1)(v) made production of the trade licence a condition for grant, and Rule 9-A governed renewal of Form 2B licences. The reduced annual fee applies only where the authorities fail to renew on time despite the applicant&#039;s compliance. As the delay here was attributable to the applicant&#039;s non-compliance, payment of the full annual licence fee was correctly insisted upon.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 267 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337187</link>
      <description>A licensee who filed a timely renewal application for a Form 2B excise licence could not claim the reduced-fee benefit under Rule 10(3)(b)(ii) because renewal was delayed by his own failure to produce the mandatory trade licence. Rule 6(1)(v) made production of the trade licence a condition for grant, and Rule 9-A governed renewal of Form 2B licences. The reduced annual fee applies only where the authorities fail to renew on time despite the applicant&#039;s compliance. As the delay here was attributable to the applicant&#039;s non-compliance, payment of the full annual licence fee was correctly insisted upon.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>