<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 505 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189282</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty on the gifts received by the assessee, as they were disclosed in the returns and revised returns were filed to avoid litigation. However, the penalty on the commission paid for arranging the gifts was confirmed as it was not covered by Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c). The appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 15:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 505 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189282</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty on the gifts received by the assessee, as they were disclosed in the returns and revised returns were filed to avoid litigation. However, the penalty on the commission paid for arranging the gifts was confirmed as it was not covered by Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c). The appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>