<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 678 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189277</link>
    <description>Section 26 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act authorises notice to a person holding money due to a dealer, provides that payment in compliance with the notice is a valid discharge, and, read with Section 24, supports a statutory charge for sales tax arrears. The commentary explains that a power of attorney or equitable assignment over a fund does not divest the dealer of ownership of the money so as to defeat statutory recovery of public revenue. On that basis, the sales tax authority&#039;s claim prevails over the bank&#039;s private arrangement, and the garnishee is discharged by paying the department under the statutory notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 678 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189277</link>
      <description>Section 26 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act authorises notice to a person holding money due to a dealer, provides that payment in compliance with the notice is a valid discharge, and, read with Section 24, supports a statutory charge for sales tax arrears. The commentary explains that a power of attorney or equitable assignment over a fund does not divest the dealer of ownership of the money so as to defeat statutory recovery of public revenue. On that basis, the sales tax authority&#039;s claim prevails over the bank&#039;s private arrangement, and the garnishee is discharged by paying the department under the statutory notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>