<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 253 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337173</link>
    <description>The court directed the assessing officer to re-do the assessments for AY 1998-99 and 1999-2000 concerning excess depreciation reversed and provision for land development withdrawn, in light of Section 115JA and relevant case law, within three months. The additional issue regarding the provision for taxation in T.C.A.No.1419 of 2007 was resolved in favor of the department. Both tax case appeals were disposed of in these terms, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:57:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 253 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337173</link>
      <description>The court directed the assessing officer to re-do the assessments for AY 1998-99 and 1999-2000 concerning excess depreciation reversed and provision for land development withdrawn, in light of Section 115JA and relevant case law, within three months. The additional issue regarding the provision for taxation in T.C.A.No.1419 of 2007 was resolved in favor of the department. Both tax case appeals were disposed of in these terms, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>