<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 251 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337171</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to re-examine the issues concerning the disallowance of the loss on sale of shares, payments to sub-contractors for want of TDS, and expenses under Section 14A. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to consider the revised return as valid and to reassess the issues in light of relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:57:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 251 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337171</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to re-examine the issues concerning the disallowance of the loss on sale of shares, payments to sub-contractors for want of TDS, and expenses under Section 14A. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to consider the revised return as valid and to reassess the issues in light of relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>