<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 246 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337166</link>
    <description>The Indo-Swiss DTAA Protocol did not import a &quot;make available&quot; condition, because no express amendment or renegotiation incorporated such a term; Swiss remittances therefore remained taxable in India as fees for technical services. By contrast, the Canada and USA treaties contained a make available requirement, and the non-residents only supplied technical or bio-analytical reports without transferring usable technical knowledge, skill, know-how or process enabling independent use by the payer. Those payments were therefore not taxable as fees for included services, and no TDS liability arose on them. The appellate order sustaining tax only on the Swiss remittances was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 246 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337166</link>
      <description>The Indo-Swiss DTAA Protocol did not import a &quot;make available&quot; condition, because no express amendment or renegotiation incorporated such a term; Swiss remittances therefore remained taxable in India as fees for technical services. By contrast, the Canada and USA treaties contained a make available requirement, and the non-residents only supplied technical or bio-analytical reports without transferring usable technical knowledge, skill, know-how or process enabling independent use by the payer. Those payments were therefore not taxable as fees for included services, and no TDS liability arose on them. The appellate order sustaining tax only on the Swiss remittances was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>