<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 245 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337165</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to disallow the expenses claimed under &quot;other expenses&quot; for Assessment Year 2007-08, amounting to Rs. 4,70,990/-. The Tribunal found that the method used by the appellant resulted in double deduction as the expenses had already been accounted for in earlier years. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowance of the expenses in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 245 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337165</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to disallow the expenses claimed under &quot;other expenses&quot; for Assessment Year 2007-08, amounting to Rs. 4,70,990/-. The Tribunal found that the method used by the appellant resulted in double deduction as the expenses had already been accounted for in earlier years. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowance of the expenses in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>