https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337158 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order and ruling that the harvesting and transportation of sugarcane to a factory do not constitute 'Business Auxiliary Services' subject to Service Tax. The Tribunal referred to precedents, including the Dnyaneshwar Trust case, to support its decision, emphasizing that such activities do not fall within the taxable category. This decision provides clarity on the taxability of services related to sugarcane harvesting and transportation, ensuring consistent application of tax laws in similar cases. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:56:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337158 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order and ruling that the harvesting and transportation of sugarcane to a factory do not constitute 'Business Auxiliary Services' subject to Service Tax. The Tribunal referred to precedents, including the Dnyaneshwar Trust case, to support its decision, emphasizing that such activities do not fall within the taxable category. This decision provides clarity on the taxability of services related to sugarcane harvesting and transportation, ensuring consistent application of tax laws in similar cases. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337158