<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 228 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals against the duty demand, penalties, and confiscation of goods and cash. It found the evidence presented insufficient to support the duty demand based on unaccounted copper ingots and wire rods. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in valuation, reliance on retracted statements, and lack of detailed investigation. Allegations of natural justice violations and clandestine clearance were contested, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the order due to insufficient evidence and lack of support for allegations of clandestine activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 228 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals against the duty demand, penalties, and confiscation of goods and cash. It found the evidence presented insufficient to support the duty demand based on unaccounted copper ingots and wire rods. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in valuation, reliance on retracted statements, and lack of detailed investigation. Allegations of natural justice violations and clandestine clearance were contested, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the order due to insufficient evidence and lack of support for allegations of clandestine activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>