<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 227 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and interest on the appellant for repacking lubricating oil into containers and clearing them without paying the appropriate duty. The penalty under Section 11AC was also upheld due to established suppression. The penalty on the director was reduced from Rs. 2 lakhs to Rs. 50,000 considering his limited involvement in the evasion. Both appeals were disposed of on 22/12/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 227 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and interest on the appellant for repacking lubricating oil into containers and clearing them without paying the appropriate duty. The penalty under Section 11AC was also upheld due to established suppression. The penalty on the director was reduced from Rs. 2 lakhs to Rs. 50,000 considering his limited involvement in the evasion. Both appeals were disposed of on 22/12/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>