https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337145 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalty on the appellant, the Chief Executive Officer of a company, for involvement in clandestine removal despite the company paying dues. The appellant's argument against the applicability of penalty provisions was rejected. While legal precedents cited were deemed irrelevant, the Tribunal reduced the penalty amount, considering the appellant's liability. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. en-us Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:55:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337145 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalty on the appellant, the Chief Executive Officer of a company, for involvement in clandestine removal despite the company paying dues. The appellant's argument against the applicability of penalty provisions was rejected. While legal precedents cited were deemed irrelevant, the Tribunal reduced the penalty amount, considering the appellant's liability. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337145