<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 224 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the correct timing of Cenvat Credit on capital goods, setting aside the recovery by the Adjudicating authority. However, the appeal was rejected regarding the cash refund of Education Cess &amp;amp; S&amp;amp;H Education Cess, in line with previous decisions favoring the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 224 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the correct timing of Cenvat Credit on capital goods, setting aside the recovery by the Adjudicating authority. However, the appeal was rejected regarding the cash refund of Education Cess &amp;amp; S&amp;amp;H Education Cess, in line with previous decisions favoring the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>