<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 221 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337141</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, ruling that the respondent was eligible for duty-free procurement of Hexane under Notification No. 43/2001-CE(NT) for manufacturing Refined Edible Oil. The Tribunal found that the Hexane was used in compliance with concessional duty rules and previous judgments, even though it was also used for non-exported oil production. It was determined that goods used in manufacturing export goods are eligible for duty-free benefits, and the generation of oil during the process was deemed unavoidable. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s eligibility for the duty-free benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:55:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 221 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337141</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, ruling that the respondent was eligible for duty-free procurement of Hexane under Notification No. 43/2001-CE(NT) for manufacturing Refined Edible Oil. The Tribunal found that the Hexane was used in compliance with concessional duty rules and previous judgments, even though it was also used for non-exported oil production. It was determined that goods used in manufacturing export goods are eligible for duty-free benefits, and the generation of oil during the process was deemed unavoidable. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s eligibility for the duty-free benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>