<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 213 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337133</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that they were eligible for the exemption under Notification No.67/95-CE for captively consumed clinker used in the manufacture of cement cleared to SEZ units without payment of duty. The Tribunal found that the denial of exemption by the Original Authority was not legally justifiable, setting aside the original order and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 213 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337133</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that they were eligible for the exemption under Notification No.67/95-CE for captively consumed clinker used in the manufacture of cement cleared to SEZ units without payment of duty. The Tribunal found that the denial of exemption by the Original Authority was not legally justifiable, setting aside the original order and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>