<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 200 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337120</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the petitions filed by the assessee, upholding the reopening of the assessment based on new material discovered during a survey and the imposition of Central Sales Tax (CST) on the sales. However, the court directed the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 65 of the Act, as the original assessment was not a case of self-assessment but conducted after scrutinizing the books of account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 200 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337120</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the petitions filed by the assessee, upholding the reopening of the assessment based on new material discovered during a survey and the imposition of Central Sales Tax (CST) on the sales. However, the court directed the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 65 of the Act, as the original assessment was not a case of self-assessment but conducted after scrutinizing the books of account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>