<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 198 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337118</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction governed the assessment, and the same issue had already been decided in favour of the Revenue. On that basis, the Tax Board could not delete the tax, interest and penalty or interfere with the direction that the assessee be assessed by the competent assessing officer. The High Court held that the direction of the Dy. Commissioner (Appeals) requiring assessment by the officer having territorial jurisdiction was consistent with the governing jurisdictional requirement, and the Tax Board&#039;s contrary order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:53:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 198 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337118</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction governed the assessment, and the same issue had already been decided in favour of the Revenue. On that basis, the Tax Board could not delete the tax, interest and penalty or interfere with the direction that the assessee be assessed by the competent assessing officer. The High Court held that the direction of the Dy. Commissioner (Appeals) requiring assessment by the officer having territorial jurisdiction was consistent with the governing jurisdictional requirement, and the Tax Board&#039;s contrary order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>