<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 197 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337117</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the timely receipt of machines and overall investment in industrial unit development. The judgment stressed interpreting beneficial provisions leniently and not rejecting claims based on technicalities, especially when the essence of the project report was maintained. The court extended the benefit of exemption for the two machines, quashing the Tax Board and DLSC orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:53:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 197 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337117</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the timely receipt of machines and overall investment in industrial unit development. The judgment stressed interpreting beneficial provisions leniently and not rejecting claims based on technicalities, especially when the essence of the project report was maintained. The court extended the benefit of exemption for the two machines, quashing the Tax Board and DLSC orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>