<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 195 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337115</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision of the Tax Board, emphasizing the importance of providing acceptable evidence, such as exemption certificates, to support claims of double taxation. Despite opportunities given, the petitioner failed to produce exemption certificates over almost 16 years. The court stressed the need for finality in legal matters and dismissed the revision petition for lacking merit, finding no perversity, infirmity, or illegality in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 195 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337115</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision of the Tax Board, emphasizing the importance of providing acceptable evidence, such as exemption certificates, to support claims of double taxation. Despite opportunities given, the petitioner failed to produce exemption certificates over almost 16 years. The court stressed the need for finality in legal matters and dismissed the revision petition for lacking merit, finding no perversity, infirmity, or illegality in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>