https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337113 The Court quashed the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal's order directing payment of 15% of the demand during the pendency of the revision application. The petitioner successfully challenged the order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, citing a previous decision by the Tribunal and Division Bench of the High Court. The Court granted the petitioner unconditional stay of the entire demand, emphasizing consistency in decisions and the right to seek such relief during legal proceedings. This case underscores the fair and just approach to resolving tax-related disputes during legal proceedings. en-us Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jan 2017 15:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337113 The Court quashed the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal's order directing payment of 15% of the demand during the pendency of the revision application. The petitioner successfully challenged the order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, citing a previous decision by the Tribunal and Division Bench of the High Court. The Court granted the petitioner unconditional stay of the entire demand, emphasizing consistency in decisions and the right to seek such relief during legal proceedings. This case underscores the fair and just approach to resolving tax-related disputes during legal proceedings. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337113