https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189264 State Government directions under section 78-A of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 were effective only if they related to policy; they could not compel the Board to make straight appointments, because the Board retained the statutory power of appointment under section 15. An expired selection panel created no continuing right to appointment, and the undertaking given by the candidates as Operators did not permanently bar future consideration. Under Rule 7 of the 1982 Cadre Rules, the candidates were entitled only to consideration for appointment in accordance with the recruitment scheme and vacancy position, not automatic absorption. en-us Fri, 10 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:39:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189264 State Government directions under section 78-A of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 were effective only if they related to policy; they could not compel the Board to make straight appointments, because the Board retained the statutory power of appointment under section 15. An expired selection panel created no continuing right to appointment, and the undertaking given by the candidates as Operators did not permanently bar future consideration. Under Rule 7 of the 1982 Cadre Rules, the candidates were entitled only to consideration for appointment in accordance with the recruitment scheme and vacancy position, not automatic absorption. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189264