<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 648 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189263</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the HC&#039;s judgment that the respondent-Corporation&#039;s actions were illegal. The HC quashed the incorporation of respondent No. 7&#039;s name in the municipal register and declared the auction of Plot No. 2557 invalid, as statutory lease requirements were unmet. The PIL was deemed maintainable, emphasizing public interest and procedural fairness. The property remained with the respondent-Corporation, and the appellant&#039;s claim was rejected due to lack of possession and execution of a lease deed. The SC found no procedural error, concluding substantial justice was served, and dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2024 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 648 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189263</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the HC&#039;s judgment that the respondent-Corporation&#039;s actions were illegal. The HC quashed the incorporation of respondent No. 7&#039;s name in the municipal register and declared the auction of Plot No. 2557 invalid, as statutory lease requirements were unmet. The PIL was deemed maintainable, emphasizing public interest and procedural fairness. The property remained with the respondent-Corporation, and the appellant&#039;s claim was rejected due to lack of possession and execution of a lease deed. The SC found no procedural error, concluding substantial justice was served, and dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>