https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189262 The SC allowed the appeals filed by the Board and the State of U.P., dismissing the appeal from SLP(C) No. 15797 of 2001. The SC set aside the judgments dated 11.8.2000 and 5.9.2000, upholding the judgment dated 13.11.2000. The SC directed the Board and Market Committees to fill existing vacancies per legal requirements, considering terminated employees' candidatures with possible age-bar relaxation. The SC ruled that the HC's directions for regularisation and reinstatement were unjustified, emphasizing that regularisation is not a valid appointment method and illegal appointments cannot be regularised. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2024 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189262 The SC allowed the appeals filed by the Board and the State of U.P., dismissing the appeal from SLP(C) No. 15797 of 2001. The SC set aside the judgments dated 11.8.2000 and 5.9.2000, upholding the judgment dated 13.11.2000. The SC directed the Board and Market Committees to fill existing vacancies per legal requirements, considering terminated employees' candidatures with possible age-bar relaxation. The SC ruled that the HC's directions for regularisation and reinstatement were unjustified, emphasizing that regularisation is not a valid appointment method and illegal appointments cannot be regularised. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189262