https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189262 Appointments made outside the governing Act, Rules and Regulations were treated as illegal and incapable of regularisation because regularisation cannot cure a breach of statutory procedure or Articles 14 and 16. The State's policy directions addressing such appointments were considered within its statutory sphere and were not found to be arbitrary or discriminatory merely because they applied a cut-off date and a last-come-first-go approach. The High Court could not quash termination orders or direct continuance and regularisation where no lawful right to hold the posts had arisen. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2024 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189262 Appointments made outside the governing Act, Rules and Regulations were treated as illegal and incapable of regularisation because regularisation cannot cure a breach of statutory procedure or Articles 14 and 16. The State's policy directions addressing such appointments were considered within its statutory sphere and were not found to be arbitrary or discriminatory merely because they applied a cut-off date and a last-come-first-go approach. The High Court could not quash termination orders or direct continuance and regularisation where no lawful right to hold the posts had arisen. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189262