<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 685 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189261</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a partnership firm in the construction business, remanding the case to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration of the deduction claim under section 80IB(10). The disallowance of the claim was overturned as the firm produced a CBDT notification post the CIT(Appeals) decision, necessitating a fresh assessment with the firm&#039;s input.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 685 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189261</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a partnership firm in the construction business, remanding the case to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration of the deduction claim under section 80IB(10). The disallowance of the claim was overturned as the firm produced a CBDT notification post the CIT(Appeals) decision, necessitating a fresh assessment with the firm&#039;s input.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>