<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 607 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189258</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s order treating the assessee as in default under Section 201(1) and levying interest under Section 201(1A). The appeal was allowed as the excess amount realized by the travel agent over the net fare was not considered commission, absolving the assessee of TDS liability under Section 194H.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:43:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 607 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189258</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s order treating the assessee as in default under Section 201(1) and levying interest under Section 201(1A). The appeal was allowed as the excess amount realized by the travel agent over the net fare was not considered commission, absolving the assessee of TDS liability under Section 194H.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>