<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (3) TMI 39 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189259</link>
    <description>A manufacturer&#039;s return was assessed on a practical, commonsense reading of the word &quot;delivered&quot;. Although the form contemplated physical delivery, the goods had left the manufacturer&#039;s premises, been appropriated to sale, passed out of the manufacturer&#039;s control, and were under the actual control of the selling agent, so the agent could properly be treated as the recipient of delivery. In a penal setting, ambiguous words should not be construed so technically as to turn honest and substantial compliance into a criminal breach. On that basis, the return was treated as true and accurate and the convictions could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:43:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (3) TMI 39 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189259</link>
      <description>A manufacturer&#039;s return was assessed on a practical, commonsense reading of the word &quot;delivered&quot;. Although the form contemplated physical delivery, the goods had left the manufacturer&#039;s premises, been appropriated to sale, passed out of the manufacturer&#039;s control, and were under the actual control of the selling agent, so the agent could properly be treated as the recipient of delivery. In a penal setting, ambiguous words should not be construed so technically as to turn honest and substantial compliance into a criminal breach. On that basis, the return was treated as true and accurate and the convictions could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>