<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 185 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337105</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It considered the unrecovered amount of ? 2,93,611 as a business loss under Section 28, allowing the bad debts claim. However, it upheld the disallowance of interest on loan and pre-payment charges amounting to ? 16,64,716 and ? 3,12,107 respectively, as revenue expenditures due to insufficient evidence showing the hotel was ready for use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 185 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337105</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It considered the unrecovered amount of ? 2,93,611 as a business loss under Section 28, allowing the bad debts claim. However, it upheld the disallowance of interest on loan and pre-payment charges amounting to ? 16,64,716 and ? 3,12,107 respectively, as revenue expenditures due to insufficient evidence showing the hotel was ready for use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>