<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Deduction u/s 54F Shouldn&#039;t Be Denied Based on Assumptions About Wife&#039;s Mortgage Contribution.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32662</link>
    <description>Disallowance of deduction U/s 54F - the wife of the assessee could have included the value of construction for mortgage purposes and this alone does not mean that construction was carried out by the wife of the assessee out of her own funds so as to deny the assessee the benefit of deduction - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:16:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:16:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Deduction u/s 54F Shouldn&#039;t Be Denied Based on Assumptions About Wife&#039;s Mortgage Contribution.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32662</link>
      <description>Disallowance of deduction U/s 54F - the wife of the assessee could have included the value of construction for mortgage purposes and this alone does not mean that construction was carried out by the wife of the assessee out of her own funds so as to deny the assessee the benefit of deduction - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:16:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>