<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 173 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337093</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of sec 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court considered the ownership of silver bars and the addition of unexplained investment, treating the confiscation loss as a business loss. This decision aligned with legal precedents, resulting in the quashing of the penalty order and remittance back to the Tribunal for a consolidated decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 173 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337093</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of sec 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court considered the ownership of silver bars and the addition of unexplained investment, treating the confiscation loss as a business loss. This decision aligned with legal precedents, resulting in the quashing of the penalty order and remittance back to the Tribunal for a consolidated decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>