https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337089 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of an equal amount of penalty under Section 78, considering the appellant's suppression of facts with intent to evade tax payment. The appellant's challenge to the penalties imposed was dismissed, except for an adjustment in the confirmed demand related to a payment for an earlier period. The impugned order confirming service tax, interest, and penalties under Section 78 was sustained, with the penalty under Section 76 being set aside. The appeal was dismissed, and the judgment was pronounced on 13.12.16. en-us Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337089 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of an equal amount of penalty under Section 78, considering the appellant's suppression of facts with intent to evade tax payment. The appellant's challenge to the penalties imposed was dismissed, except for an adjustment in the confirmed demand related to a payment for an earlier period. The impugned order confirming service tax, interest, and penalties under Section 78 was sustained, with the penalty under Section 76 being set aside. The appeal was dismissed, and the judgment was pronounced on 13.12.16. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337089