<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 168 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for further review due to the pending Supreme Court appeal regarding the tenant&#039;s liability for service tax. The impugned order confirming the service tax demand and penalty was set aside, emphasizing the necessity to await the Supreme Court&#039;s decision before concluding the matter. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the stay granted by the Supreme Court in favor of the tenant was considered, leading to the decision for a fresh assessment post the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 168 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for further review due to the pending Supreme Court appeal regarding the tenant&#039;s liability for service tax. The impugned order confirming the service tax demand and penalty was set aside, emphasizing the necessity to await the Supreme Court&#039;s decision before concluding the matter. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the stay granted by the Supreme Court in favor of the tenant was considered, leading to the decision for a fresh assessment post the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>